arieswytch ([info]arieswytch) wrote,
@ 2009-06-23 06:26:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
FAA Reauthorization Act
Recently, FedEx created a website which is supposed to tell you that UPS is seeking a bailout from the government. This couldn’t be farther from the truth. What this boils down to is some legislation that recently passed the House and is now with the Senate. This piece of legislation is called the FAA Reauthorization Act. Some wording was included in this act to exclude FedEx Express drivers and package handlers from being covered under the RLA, as they are now, and instead be covered under the NLRA, like UPS drivers and package handlers.

The RLA, Railway Labor Act, is an act that covers railways and airlines. This says that these companies must organize on a whole company level if they are going to unionize. This was originally intended so that a strike in one town would not disrupt operations countrywide. FedEx Express in its entirety is currently covered under this act. UPS pilots and airplane mechanics only are currently covered under this act.

The NLRA, National Labor Relations Act, is an act that covers all other trucking companies. This act allows unionization by location. All UPS drivers, truck/auto mechanics, and package handlers are covered under this act.

When this new act passes the Senate, then the drivers and package handlers at FedEx Express will be able to unionize by location. Now, this doesn’t necessarily mean that they will, but they will be able to if they so desire. Actually, Fed Ex has other divisions currently covered under the NLRA that have not yet chosen to organize, but FedEx would have you believe that if this passes then they will automatically have to raise rates 30% and cancel a large order with Boeing in order to compensate for increased costs due to unionization. Past history does not bear this out.

Really, what UPS is saying here is that people who do the same jobs should be governed under the same laws. Seems like a no-brainer to me.

To read UPS’ stance on the issue, go here Recently, FedEx created a website which is supposed to tell you that UPS is seeking a bailout from the government. This couldn’t be farther from the truth. What this boils down to is some legislation that recently passed the House and is now with the Senate. This piece of legislation is called the FAA Reauthorization Act. Some wording was included in this act to exclude FedEx Express drivers and package handlers from being covered under the RLA, as they are now, and instead be covered under the NLRA, like UPS drivers and package handlers.

The RLA, Railway Labor Act, is an act that covers railways and airlines. This says that these companies must organize on a whole company level if they are going to unionize. This was originally intended so that a strike in one town would not disrupt operations countrywide. FedEx Express in its entirety is currently covered under this act. UPS pilots and airplane mechanics only are currently covered under this act.

The NLRA, National Labor Relations Act, is an act that covers all other trucking companies. This act allows unionization by location. All UPS drivers, truck/auto mechanics, and package handlers are covered under this act.

When this new act passes the Senate, then the drivers and package handlers at FedEx Express will be able to unionize by location. Now, this doesn’t necessarily mean that they will, but they will be able to if they so desire. Actually, Fed Ex has other divisions currently covered under the NLRA that have not yet chosen to organize, but FedEx would have you believe that if this passes then they will automatically have to raise rates 30% and cancel a large order with Boeing in order to compensate for increased costs due to unionization. Past history does not bear this out.

Really, what UPS is saying here is that people who do the same jobs should be governed under the same laws. Seems like a no-brainer to me.

To read UPS’ stance on the issue, go here

To see FedEx’s propaganda, go here

Please email your Senators to voice your opinion on this important issue. You can find a list of Senators by state here



(Read 6 comments) - (Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2009-06-24 02:54 pm UTC (link)
Fact: More than 65% of the employees covered under the Railway Labor Act are organized, so the RLA does not prevent union organizing.
Fact: There has been a national attempt to organize FedEx Express employees covered under the Railway Labor Act for more than a decade.
Fact: FedEx Express employees nationally have rejected joining the union.
Fact: Both federal regulators and the Courts agree that FedEx Express is properly covered under the Railway Labor Act.
Fact: Now UPS has a better idea - change the law, so Fed Ex Express is thrown into a different labor system - that treating this airline like a trucking company.
Fact: The reason the Railway Labor Act exists is to prevent local unions from disrupting an entire company's capacity to deliver services to the consumer.
Fact: This potential disruption of service is UPS' goal in pushing this change in their competitor's legal status so they can benefit from a weakened competitor and increased prices to the consumer.
Fact: UPS chose a trucking business model that put their air package delivery system into the National Labor Relations Act, and FedEx Express chose an airline business model that put them into the Railway Labor Act. Now, UPS is complaining that their previous business choice puts them at a competitive disadvantage, and they need the playing field "leveled", asking Congress to legislatively impose the strategic mistake they made on their competitor.
Fact: 81% of voters reject the notion that Congress should make changes to the package delivery system since the system is not broken.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]arieswytch
2009-06-25 11:51 pm UTC (link)
It really comes down to one simple thing, the same jobs should be covered under the same law.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

That's the union spin!
(Anonymous)
2009-07-06 10:56 pm UTC (link)
"They do the same job". That's like saying apples and oranges are both fruits. The truth, and what people like you like to ignore, is that the RLA has nothing to do with the job one performs. It is designed to keep a local "job action" from shutting down an airline or railroad. That can't happen at UPS since they are already unionized nationally. But if all the package handlers in just Memphis went on strike? It would shut down the airline and put thousands of non-union employees out of work. If UPS really wants a level playing field then they should support the Teamsters efforts to nationally organize FedEx Express (which they've tried to do for years). This is nothing more than a money grab by the Teamsters and an attempt by UPS to put a competitor out of business. What other motive would there be? UPS already makes billions more than FedEx, so the playing field is already tilted in their favor. Except for a few "union towns" the majority of FedEx employees do not want a union, so this law doesn't help them. It is totally designed to benefit only two groups, UPS and the Teamsters. Is that really what our Congress is for? Think about it, is being under the NLRA really a benefit to those employees who want a union? If so, then how can it be that 70% of RLA employees are unionized and only 15% of NLRA employees? If unions can organize all the major airlines nationally then how come they can't unionize FedEx? Could it be that there is no interest?!

By the way, "UPS's Stance" - "Fedex's propaganda" Who's paying your salary? UPS or the Teamsters?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Read 6 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…